Quote:
Originally Posted by andyd
When you play wing backs they have to defend but also be creative if they receive the ball,Clark made his debut but was sacrificed for Coleman,s usual Charles out to wing back which I find strange moving last season,s top scorer into a position I don't think he particularly likes. McConville to me isn't a wing back he,s more effective behind the strikers drifting wide. As for the back three Sykes has good a defender he his he lacks a supple pass likes to launch it, we need the back three to be finding the midfield more but unfortunately without Pritchard we lose all movement and creative play. Personally prefer Rodgers even though he is good in the back three as the right sided wing back and Pritchard on the left.
|
Therein hangs another tale Andy !..
It was difficult to decide firstly if Stanley's midfield had any sort of tactical plan to adhere to, and secondly if they had were they good enough to put it into action.
MKD's midfield were everything that Morgan and Co needed to be
which made the result an inevitable .
I won't use the term ' unfit for purpose' but the thought lingers on in my mind !..
My plea is still that The Reds somehow return to playing controlled and intended passing and attacking rather than the random booting of a ball which we witnessed on Saturday.. but still the battle-cry is :-
ON STANLEY !.. ON TO GREATER THINGS !!..