I know there seems less and less to believe from the BBC these days but am I reading this report on Mitch Clark correctly?
It implies that he ‘got off’ with what appears to be a slapped wrist in part because he bet that Stanley would lose….but did not benefit financially!
Jings, given the results Stanley had last season it doesn’t say much of his gambling prowess that he picked to bet against his team mates in one game that didn’t end in a loss.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/66113684