[Gayle]

Questions from Acrylic-Bob

I think I've answered most of these questions before but I'll repeat some answers.


1. Since the Coppice is such a sensitive area, why can this project not be located elsewhere in the borough?

The Coppice has outstanding views over Accrington. Accrington is the main town in the borough and should be viewed. If the site of the Panopticon becomes the main issue then perhaps alternatives should be sought. The Coppice does need some attention - paths, the memorial and the shelter, etc - would we really want to pass up the chance of restoring them all to put something on the top of a more faceless hill?

2. Why do we appear to be stuck with Mr Beard as the designer. Can we change him for someone else?

Peter Beard was selected by a three stage process. The curator of the process spoke to many architects to find out who would be interested in pitching and which site they would be interested in pitching for. She then selected five designers for each site (Burnley, Ribble Valley and Hyndburn). The steering group then selected three out of the five to present designs to the public. These three designers presented their designs and Peter Beard was unanimously selected. So, yes, I think Peter is the designer for Hyndburn whatever happens with the site. In his defense he was particularly interested in the site because he has an interest in military history and he is thoroughly enjoying soaking up the history of the Pals and the town.

3. What is the point of having a landmark that can only be seen from the air? I don't know whether you have noticed, but there are not that many owners of light aircraft in the borough.

It can be seen from Hambledon Hill. It is also supposed to be viewed from within and enjoyed as an experience. It is supposed to be a place to meet, picnic and enjoy.

4. The Furrows are designed to fill up with rainwater, fine. But, what about the safety aspect?

Agree, it needs to be looked at. Once again I'll reiterate the project is in its infancy in Hyndburn so we don't have all the answers yet. A risk assessment will have to be done without a doubt.

5. The design is said to be 100 metres in diameter, how does this equate with the previously stated aim of preserving the existing trench layout of the site and how much damage is going to be caused by earth moving machinery?

I've seen a plan from above and it doesn't go near the trenches, they start surprisingly further back than anyone has the impression they do. If earth moving machinery is required damage will be minimised. Peter Beard has employed an ecologist as part of his team to look at wildlife and the impact on it both during and after the build.