Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob
I'm Sorry Gayle, this is not a personal dig even though it might read that way. But nothing you have said this evening convinces me that this is good idea or that anyone involved has the least idea of what they are doing. Accrington will end up with another white elephant, all concerned will pat themselves and each other on the back and then walk away. While the rest of us will just have to be damned grateful because at least we got some "art" out of it.
Thanks for taking the time to come and answer our questions. It is very much appreciated.
Perhaps you might like to persuade Peter Beard to join in our discussions?
|
Acrylic-Bob I have a couple of questions for you as I have answered so many of yours.
Firstly, in one of your later questions you state that the people who attended the meeting is only 0.001% of the population of the town. If that is the case, does that not mean that only 0.00025% of the town are protesting against it? And doesn't it mean that over 99.999% either don't know or don't care enough to make their views known either way?
Secondly, I think it's an old trick to try and discredit someone's entire argument on a minor technicality like the name of the over looking hill. But I have already asked you this question twice and not received an answer, so for the third time - is it true that the Coppice is overlooked by a hill which will give you a view of the Panopticon from a higher point?
I doubt that Peter Beard will join the discussion but I would be interested to see if Peter Britcliffe would be willing to. Or perhaps even the editor of the Accrington Observer who seems to have very strong opinions in opposition to the scheme.