Re: jackson Verdict
the thing that made my mind up on his innocence were 2 things
1:the accusers in this trial were so obviously lying through their teeth stevie wonder could see it
2: witnesses came forward saying they saw jackson molest children yet when the 3 children now grown up adults and nothing to fear from jackson testified they said no jackson never did anything at all to them and one of them was a wealthy hollywood star
the way i see it is that if i was molested as a child and appeared in court i would not protect my attacker
and if been rich got bought you freedom there wouldnt be any rich people in jail
all the prosecution had were ex employees with grudges and failed lawsuits agains jackson and a scrounging mother looking for a fast dollar
the defence didnt use any dirty trick like some say, they simply produced reliable witnesses
also i would like to add that i dont like jacksons music and i think hes a total nut bat but i dont think he abuses kids there were many things left un mentioned in the jordash case which were brought to light in a bbc documentary i think it was and it put a totaly different light on it
jackson should have fought that case all he did was arouse suspicion when he paid for it to go away rather than fight but after this trial i can understand why he didnt want to go through a court case
Last edited by chav1; 14-06-2005 at 16:36.
|