Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dillon
"The comment by Dillon appears to me to be a bald attempt at censorship by intimidation.
"The membership of this forum take freedom of speech issues very seriously and do not take kindly to attempts at interference with such freedoms."
Thanks A-B nice to know that the freedom of speech extends to all members...Ah, but wait, apparently not to me.
Let's not get personal, eh?
|
No one, as far as l read, stopped you from making your comments Dillon. Therefore you have the same freedom of speech as those of us who defended Gayle's right to express her opinions on matters relating to her life outside of her job.
Again forgive me if l am wrong, but you made it 'personal' by targeting one member's right to freedom of speech.
Like l said Gayle has the cyber bollocks [so to speak, and not literally,] to post under her own name, and not a nom de plume. Reading through your past postings, half of them seem to be against the Panopticon, and at least half mention quotes from The Lancashire Evening Telegraph.
Is there something you aren't telling us? I hope you don't have a conflict of 'professional interest;, or a hidden agenda?