Thread: Poor Gates
View Single Post
Old 05-09-2005, 15:12   #63
yerself
God Member
 
yerself's Avatar
 

Re: Poor Gates

Quote:
Originally Posted by big al
Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by mellowyellow
Not entirely true. The conference is the body that requests a minimum admission charge which I believe is £10.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


Sorry but you are wrong. That information came directly from the mouth of both Eric & Frank also repeated it to me on Saturday when discussing low gates.
Rather than deal in hearsay, rumour or conjecture I sent the following e-mail to The Conference:

On the Accrington Stanley Web Forum a discussion is taking
place regarding attendance levels. Of course one of the reasons cited is the
admission charge, included is a post from the discussion: "The
conference is the body that requests a minimum admission charge which I
believe is £10."
I wonder if you could be so kind as to verify the accuracy
of this statement.

I received the following reply half an hour ago:

Thank you for your email, I have passed it on to someone who should be able
to assist you.


Joanna Adams



The Football Conference Ltd

51 Highfield Road

Dartford

Kent

DA1 2JS

When the answer arrives I will, of course, post it.
__________________
Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly succeed, and are right.

Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive.
yerself is offline   Reply With Quote