Accrington Web - View Single Post

WillowTheWhisp · 11-09-2005, 20:51

Wait a minute A-b, let me think.

£30,000 you never have to pay back at any time ever versus £30,000 you have to pay back if you sell your house or die.

Erm, takes a lot of thinking about that does. I can see why the council got confused. I mean the figure of £30,000 features in both alternatives so that has obviously confused them.................but I know which one I'd prefer and I dare say any given member of Hyndborg BC if asked "Hey would you like £30,000 for free or £30,000 you have to pay back?" would pretty soon find they can understand the difference too.

No wonder the residents in Phase II are complaining.

Anyoldhow. Quite apart from anything else surely it's is the council's responsibility to rehouse these people? Will they find alternative housing for £30,000?

11-09-2005, 20:51	#9
WillowTheWhisp Resident Waffler Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Accrington, Hyndburn Posts: 18,142 Blog Entries: 14 Liked: 14 times Rep Power: 1062	Re: Project Lame Duck Wait a minute A-b, let me think. £30,000 you never have to pay back at any time ever versus £30,000 you have to pay back if you sell your house or die. Erm, takes a lot of thinking about that does. I can see why the council got confused. I mean the figure of £30,000 features in both alternatives so that has obviously confused them.................but I know which one I'd prefer and I dare say any given member of Hyndborg BC if asked "Hey would you like £30,000 for free or £30,000 you have to pay back?" would pretty soon find they can understand the difference too. No wonder the residents in Phase II are complaining. Anyoldhow. Quite apart from anything else surely it's is the council's responsibility to rehouse these people? Will they find alternative housing for £30,000? __________________