Accrington Web - View Single Post

Bad-Wolf · 07-12-2005, 07:57

As a conservative all my life I have to disagree with many of the comments above. Cameron may indeed have the gift of the gab and may have won over many conservative party member's into thinking that he is the answer.

If anyone saw this cretin being interviewed by Paxman a couple of weeks ago then wou will have noticed how he went out the way to avoid the questions being asked and also that he changed his mind about policies he had endorsed only a few weeks earlier. He is (I am sorry to say) like most other politicians that have been seen this last few years. In other words, he is a liar who will say whatever he thinks people want him to say in order to get into power. I would like to warrant that what ever he does do, assuming of course they win the next election will be pretty much what Blair did, which as we all know was not what he said he would be doing!

As another matter of point, Garinda is right. It is a civil contract between partners in order to recognise their union/partnership not a wedding or marriage. This arrangement of course is one which will only be recognised by the state and not by any of the main stream religions.

07-12-2005, 07:57	#28
Bad-Wolf Full Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 296 Liked: 0 times Rep Power: 41	Re: Tattoos and Dykes. As a conservative all my life I have to disagree with many of the comments above. Cameron may indeed have the gift of the gab and may have won over many conservative party member's into thinking that he is the answer. If anyone saw this cretin being interviewed by Paxman a couple of weeks ago then wou will have noticed how he went out the way to avoid the questions being asked and also that he changed his mind about policies he had endorsed only a few weeks earlier. He is (I am sorry to say) like most other politicians that have been seen this last few years. In other words, he is a liar who will say whatever he thinks people want him to say in order to get into power. I would like to warrant that what ever he does do, assuming of course they win the next election will be pretty much what Blair did, which as we all know was not what he said he would be doing! As another matter of point, Garinda is right. It is a civil contract between partners in order to recognise their union/partnership not a wedding or marriage. This arrangement of course is one which will only be recognised by the state and not by any of the main stream religions.