Accrington Web - View Single Post

Henry Morton · 22-01-2006, 21:24

Well, of course I'm pleased for for those forum members who bought Saturday's programme.

However, I'm very sympathetic with those who were unable to obtain one as a result of this significant shortfall - particularly our guests from Cambridge who seem to have been treated in a rather cavalier fashion; I was told by several of them after the match that not one of them had been able to acquire said programme. They intend to contact the Club Office first thing on Monday.

Football is supposed to be a classless game where the dustman might rub shoulders with the duke. It emphatically is not (at least at Conference level) about creating "haves" and "have nots".

Ossyclogger makes the point succinctly that not enough were printed, but if it was a deliberate decision by ASFC then I'm deeply disappointed.

22-01-2006, 21:24	#13
Henry Morton I am Banned Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 623 Liked: 0 times Rep Power: 0	Re: Cambridge Program [sic] Well, of course I'm pleased for for those forum members who bought Saturday's programme. However, I'm very sympathetic with those who were unable to obtain one as a result of this significant shortfall - particularly our guests from Cambridge who seem to have been treated in a rather cavalier fashion; I was told by several of them after the match that not one of them had been able to acquire said programme. They intend to contact the Club Office first thing on Monday. Football is supposed to be a classless game where the dustman might rub shoulders with the duke. It emphatically is not (at least at Conference level) about creating "haves" and "have nots". Ossyclogger makes the point succinctly that not enough were printed, but if it was a deliberate decision by ASFC then I'm deeply disappointed.