Accrington Web - View Single Post

yerself · 05-03-2006, 11:29

I think it would be cheaper to have the pics printed at Garth Dawsons or somewhere similar but there again I could buy trout at a supermarket. The ones I catch myself always taste better though.
As to RAW vs jpeg I'll give it a try and see if saving the pics in RAW format solves the printing problem. The camera's a Minolta Dynax D5 btw.

05-03-2006, 11:29	#3
yerself God Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land Posts: 3,212 Liked: 328 times Rep Power: 12996	Re: RAW or processed? I think it would be cheaper to have the pics printed at Garth Dawsons or somewhere similar but there again I could buy trout at a supermarket. The ones I catch myself always taste better though. As to RAW vs jpeg I'll give it a try and see if saving the pics in RAW format solves the printing problem. The camera's a Minolta Dynax D5 btw. __________________ Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly succeed, and are right. Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive.