Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SimonStone
Hmmm! No disrespect, but the way it was announced on the pitch with the long rambling intro, etc, gave the impression thata it amounted to much more than a few quid in sponsorship. Too much topspin on that announcement one suspects.
|
Why? I am guessing it was a lot more than a few quid... are you suggesting that because it was a big amount then it should be used to pay for the roof?
eg: If you sponsor the dugouts for 50 quid then you get to advertise... but if you sponser them for 5 thousand quid you get to own them?. is that your way of thinking?
I am guessing the announcement was true and it was a big amount... It still stands that he only paid for the right to name it.. not build it.
