Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Oggy
Certainly not, but surely they're not mutually exclusive, or would the roof be built if we weren't going up?
Probably the club has struck a balance, a business plan, with a view to maximising income, fair enough. But that would seem to be where the club (any club), and its supporters' views start to diverge, to varying degrees.
Personally I'd put a roof, and the increased atmosphere that would lead to, above a pint and a burger. It will be interesting to see how the new pricing structure reflects on the proposed changes.
[Just for the record, any sign of the "Golden Arches", and I'm off]
|
Ynorically (as they say in Accrington) it might actually have been - or might still be - the case that in the event of Stanley not going up we would, indeed, have the new Clayton End Roof.
And as for the infamous Golden Arches, with the current shortage of seating I think you're more likely to suffer from Fallen Arches
