Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mick
"It’s clear my comments don’t go down well with the majority of members, fair enough, I’ve had my rant."
ER sorry i cant see how you can say this as only three members have posted out of the 3492 members on this site
|
Not all members might want to answer and could have PM'd Driller. I try to resist the urge to answer on some but give in eventually.
Right back on thread. Got to say that I agree to a certain extent with Driller to the range Rover part due to cost and road tax fuel etc. If they were that skint why are they not in an old Land Rover. Farmers were compensated for stock loss which seems askew to me as why are they not insured or does insurance not cover this kind of event. Trying to hold govenments to ransom or bring them down seems to happen periodically but those that suffer are useually those not involved. So while farmers Jones Reddwich and stokman are at the barricades who is running their alledged loss making farms?
The CA is proberly full of toffs though I still maintain as I posted earlier that "They are in some ways no different from a union protecting a way of life for its members." And if they are to be regarded as militent then are they ever going to be as bad as the unions during the 70's with vilence and all? At the end of the day any orginisation (legit that is) will defend its members rights legally, though the odd "ruffian" might go too far.