Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jambutty
But you already pay towards an extravagant monopoly garinda. Taxes many and various to the government and there is no one more extravagant than them. But I agree with you the BBC like the NHS and many other organisations ARE extravagant and far too much money is spent on management rather than product/service.
I never said that you were ignorant. Do try and read and understand what was written. I stated:
“Have it your own way garinda, if you want to live in ignorance of the facts then that is your choice.”
The BBC negotiated an annual funding level until I believe 2010 when the funding and even existence of the BBC in its present form comes up for negotiation. In between times a Quango collects the license fees on behalf of the government. Whether the amount collected is enough to cover the BBC’s annual funding or not is irrelevant, the BBC will still get the agreed annual amount. There is no way that you can call that direct funding.
I wasn’t aware that I was supposed to sit at my computer to await your majesty’s reply.
Sheeeesh! Talk about delusions of self importance.
|
You say I live in 'ignorance of the of the facts' ergo I am ignorant of the facts in your opinion as I stated, though I will get back on thread and not argue semantics with you.
Thank you for your reply. I disagree with it and still think it is wrong for the BBC to blatently advertise Saga Insurance considering how the Corporation is supposed to be funded.
As for your majesty jibe please retire backwards from my presence whilst performing a sweeping bow.
