[WillowTheWhisp]

Hang on a mo. Isn't it supposed to be the connotations (sp?) of the St George cross that allegedly upsets muslims (not that I know any muslims who actualy object to its existence) - not just the Crusades but the fact that it's a Christian symbol and that the country has a Christian symbol as it's flag? So where is the logic of replacing one Christian symbol with another Christian symbol? It's still going to be non-muslim isn't it? St George, St Alban or St anybody-you-fancy is still going to be a Christian saint and therefore non muslim. A sky blue pink cross with yellow spotted background wowuld still be a Christian symbol if it represented a saint and would therefore still have objectionable connections surely? It's like changeing an army uniform and then claiming it isn't the same army.

Silly idea.