[garinda]

Originally Posted by jaysay

Before Rindi gets his knickers in a twist, I'm not having a go at Gayle, but maybe she would like to define "Art". One only has to look at the Turner Prize to begin to scratch ones head when it comes to art. I for one was rather annoyed at the fact the the Lottery funded the National Opera to the tune of £50 million quid when the likes of Accrington Blind Society were rufused funding to upgrade their Bank street HQ. To me people who like art should fund it, or at best done try to push it down every ones neck on a basis of like it or lump it.

What is Art?

Art is undefinable.

It's conceptual.

Perhaps Immanuel Cricket Club, which was recently awarded tax payer's money from a committee headed by Peter Britcliffe, could claim to be a collective of performance artists and try and secure funding from the Arts Council of Great Britain instead, the next time they need funding?