Accrington Web - View Single Post

garinda · 16-10-2006, 08:03

Apparently BA have no problem with anyone wearing a crucifix, or any other pendant jewellery, with or without religious significance, when worn under their uniform, but not over it. This women wasn't sacked, she had been suspended because of her refusal to wear the required uniform, as stipulated in her employment contract.

As for the teacher who insists in teaching fully veiled if any male colleagues are present, she is hindering the education of her pupils, and should find another career were she can wear what she likes, or be sacked.

16-10-2006, 08:03	#6
garinda Give, give, give member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Overlookin' ducks & geese Posts: 32,411 Blog Entries: 293 Liked: 27 times Rep Power: 16469	Re: veil or cross Apparently BA have no problem with anyone wearing a crucifix, or any other pendant jewellery, with or without religious significance, when worn under their uniform, but not over it. This women wasn't sacked, she had been suspended because of her refusal to wear the required uniform, as stipulated in her employment contract. As for the teacher who insists in teaching fully veiled if any male colleagues are present, she is hindering the education of her pupils, and should find another career were she can wear what she likes, or be sacked. __________________ 'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.' Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.