[No.9 Dream]

For what its worth I thought a penalty was always on the cards. Yes he did make a bit of a meal of it and but then again he shouldnt have been allowed to get in that position so early.
The second goal..well you cant disguise the fact that it was Dunbavins error. The ref and linesman where behind play as they like us probably expected, as usual, the ball to soar gracefully over the cowshed into someones back garden when he made an a complete mess of the kick and gifted them a goal. Yes there may have been an element of handball but none of the players shouted too much ( Dunbavin included and he was facing the same way as most of us and had, lets face it, more interest in a freekick being awarded than most ). There third goal was from what I could see a good one.
There were though I thought a lot of positives to be gained from this game. Stanley never stopped battling and never looked beat even when the late third goal went in.
The second goal was well worked and Rocky took the third well.
I thought McGivern when he came on looked sharp, always dangerous and willing to run at their defence. Hopefully John will find him a place in the starting eleven against Milton Keynes ( he could work well with Mullin as he seems capable of doing the incisive running on and off the ball and getting in some penetrating crosses...and lets face it Mully could do with some solid support to work off )
I even thought the four minutes of added time was for once in Stanleys favour as we had them rocking at that point ( why did we bring a sub on and lose some of the momentum that had been building....ah well I moaned last time when Coley brought on an attacker for a defender after going down to ten men and then losing the game and we did get a vital point today so what do I know ). Anyway there is a light at the end of the tunnel that may not be the proverbial oncoming train.
Thanks for listening