Thread: nhs con
View Single Post
Old 03-10-2003, 15:15   #11
Tealeaf
God Member

 
Tealeaf's Avatar
 

Post Re: nhs con

IVF = in vitro fertilisation, or artificial insemination if you like....
and the cost quoted above is for one cycle....the new NHS rules allow for 3.

My point is.....some people are not just as lucky as others. Some grow up as midgets, others lose their hair, others have difficulty in conceiving naturally. There is no threat to health wellbeing whatsoever; they are not in pain....if they want to have kids by IVF, then let them pay for it.....it's a lifestyle choice, like going on holiday or not...

Justr as it is a lifestyle choice to make a statement by having a tatoo bunged on your head.....It might hurt when it goes on, but other than that , nothing..no pain, no health problem (other than Hepitatis c in having it done in the first place..)

Sex change - this really is a complete nonsense....I'm not happy about alot of things - I'd like free beer & I'd like to travel abit more - but I don't expect the taxpayer to pay for it. You may as well say the taxpayer should pay for your gambling down at William Hills if you're short of dosh..If someone wants a sex change, let em pay for it. It's that simple.

Remember, our survival rates in Oncology are the worst in Europe. If you want to spend money on some some souped-up drag artist, do it. But I'd rather spend the money on cancer patients and others equally deserving.

And as for the kids, again its a fact that our kids have the most sedentry lifestyle in Europe......do you get child crocodiles in Accy? Answer No.....But it's not me who is raising this point...it's the medical profession...I suggest you check out a few websites..
Tealeaf is offline   Reply With Quote