Accrington Web - View Single Post

gondola · 25-03-2007, 23:20

Ianto,

You make some very salient points, though it would be better to make such points on the basis of tangible material rather than inference.

I think readers wish to reserve this thread for discussion of the decision of the Licensing committee, hence if you wish to take on the issues re selection matters, credentials of councillors, information pertaining to specific councillors I am more than happy to contribute on a separate thread. I think there is already one set up elsewhere discussing councillors, and thus that may be the best platform to raise such matters.

So far as regards the charge that I have sought to disrupt the discussion for which this thread was set up, I would remind readers that I did provide a plethora of material in relation to that, not least including links to the actual meeting at which the decision was made, coupled with ideas to elevate the matter. Hardly the conduct of someone seeking to suppress active discussion.

Thus no more from me on unrelated matters here, and I cheerfully recommend restoration of discussion to the title of this thread.

25-03-2007, 23:20	#375
gondola I am Banned Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 202 Liked: 0 times Rep Power: 0	Re: Are You Safe In His Taxi Ianto, You make some very salient points, though it would be better to make such points on the basis of tangible material rather than inference. I think readers wish to reserve this thread for discussion of the decision of the Licensing committee, hence if you wish to take on the issues re selection matters, credentials of councillors, information pertaining to specific councillors I am more than happy to contribute on a separate thread. I think there is already one set up elsewhere discussing councillors, and thus that may be the best platform to raise such matters. So far as regards the charge that I have sought to disrupt the discussion for which this thread was set up, I would remind readers that I did provide a plethora of material in relation to that, not least including links to the actual meeting at which the decision was made, coupled with ideas to elevate the matter. Hardly the conduct of someone seeking to suppress active discussion. Thus no more from me on unrelated matters here, and I cheerfully recommend restoration of discussion to the title of this thread.