Quote:
Originally Posted by gondola
Ianto,
''but purely for selfish, self interest in one semi illiterate Councillors own back yard''
Correct me if im wrong, but are you suggesting that the decision was skewed by the disproportionate impact of one Committee member?
Now that is interesting!
You are right. The interests of the victim and other users should have been of paramount importance.
|
Just stating the obvious any fool could have worked it out, I was just saving our American cousin the pain of reading some of the double talk in this thread, you well know the influence and pressure that can be brought to bear by any committee chair on fellow members, our leader is a 'peter perfect' example of this.