Quote:
Originally Posted by Ianto.W.
if that man was still at liberty to dispense his terror where and when would it have ended?
|
Ian, doubtless, he would still be dispensing his terror on his own long-suffering subjects. In other words, the situation would be the same as it is in Zimbabwe, or Burma, or any other of the dozens of ruthless dicatatorships that exist around the world. But he would not be dispensing his terror on us, because he was a classic dictator who was concerned with his own self-interest, not with religious fundamentalism.
And, as Gayle says, what exactly did Saddam have to do with 9/11?