[jambutty]

These non-smokers who complain about having to pass the gauntlet of smokers as they go into a pub are conveniently forgetting that during their walk to the pub they breathed in far more in the form of lethal chemicals coming from vehicle exhausts. But then that’s OK ‘cos most drive cars.

Because none smokers aint making people breathe harmful substances?

Car drivers are and there’s more of them Cyfr.

why do these smokers think they have pulled one over on the non smokers it isnt the non smokers that are actually saying you aint allowed to smoke inside its the goverment....

But the non-smoking hypocrites backed the proposal and it was they who made all the fuss kathleen_firth.

If you want to suggest banning cars because of the fumes in general (not specifying that they are non-smokers) then thats another story but has nothing to do with the fact taht non-smokers drive cars.

Ah! Cyfr. But its these non-smoking car drivers who complain about having to breathe in second hand smoke yet ignore the fact that they make all and sundry breathe in their exhaust fumes. A more classic case of hypocrisy you will not find.

I dont smoke (not a surprise given my last comments) and i cant understand why anybody would. Do you people have any idea how much treatin cancer that could never have happened with out tabaco costs thing country each year? and not just people who smoke but passive smokers to.

The same old silly argument mr flibble. Don’t you know that smokers contribute far more to the national coffers than they take out for smoking related diseases?

Apart from all that don’t people realise that the government has managed to get the population arguing amongst itself and thus too busy to notice the sneaky extra taxes being imposed on us and being inexorably integrated into the EU against the wishes of the bulk of the population.