Quote:
|
The financial benefits of MFC will ensure stability and the ability to engage in long-term planning - in the interests of the club - not the whim of the chairman. Allowing the fans to have control is potentially of far greater importance.
|
And all these supporters will have a say, what happens if its a 50/50 split vote who makes the decision? If I understand it correctly, it will have a chairman and a board, who decides who these are? and if they disagree with the vote do you oust them? Like communism it is great in theory, but someone has to be in charge otherwise anarchy.
As you know all fans are fickle, so if enough want to fire the manager, does he go? or when he signs his contract it will be on the understanding that he may be fired on the wim of a few supporters?
Who decides who the manager, coaches, kitman, tea ladies etc will be?
It sounds like a good idea on paper, but power to the people........please, the average fan knows how to winge and complain, he does not know how to run a football club.
Looking at your logic that MFC is not Chavski, means that it doesn't have the ambition of the Chavs, so you are looking at buying a club and staying in the lower leagues, what happens when the owners get peeded off with staying there, they take there money and run.
What about inflation, when your 1.4 has run out do you ask for more, or do you fold and start again?
Just a couple of questions that the article doesn't answer.