View Single Post
Old 21-10-2007, 10:00   #553
katex
Resting in Peace

 
katex's Avatar
 

Re: Hyndburn to be axed.

How any councillor can be expected to vote on an issue without knowing the full implications of the costs and a future projection, does not sit well with me. This has to be treated as a business decision as Peter sees this as a way of promoting our borough and, therefore, adding to the economies. In other words a speculate to accumulate type of situation.

Just to remind you, this is a post I put up earlier of a professional opionion on the gateway signs alone :-

'As for the cost of a sign... That can vary a great deal. Gateway signs usually have to be designed, then consulted on (to make sure everybody likes them, or that suitable apathy is created that no-one bothers responding), produced, planned for and installed. The only thing I can say for sure is that this will cost more than £20,000. The engineering/installation costs alone could run into £££££.

If you are really that interested, you could take a stab at costing it yourself based on information contained within a publication called SPONS. SPONS publishes the rates of building materials and construction costs nationally (it might be available on the internet). You'd need to cost for:

2X aluminium poles
1X Mounting board with reflective microprismatic cover
Sunday working at 2X workmen (or UGGS as I like to call them)
Sawcut of carriageway
Removal of footway surface materials
Reinstatement of footway surface materials (200mm binder, 750mm sub course, 1500mm concrete, 75mm surface coarse-bitumnious tarmacadam and spray on tac-coat)

As you can probably deduce from the list of materials/work that is required for multiple signs this will surely cost more than £20,000 - but then I'm not sure what the £20,000 is for - maybe it's just for designing the sign.'
__________________
katex is offline   Reply With Quote