[shakermaker]

It's true, Coleman's tactics have yet to develop to a standard where we can use what we have to the full in League 2. You would have to be blind to think otherwise. However I do not believe that Coleman is, as others have remarked, stuck in his ways. I think he is more than capable of doing the job properly given adequate backing from the top (adequate as in parallel with the standard we are supposed to be playing at).
With the remark about training, constantly moving training grounds for daft reasons doesn't help, though it isn't an excuse for lax methods of play.
Given a fair chance, ie at least to the end of next season, Coleman can gain the experience required to do us proud - but only if his employers allow him to.

One of my main worries will Stanley become just another League team with a rotation of 3 managers per year, never really achieving anything, merely surviving, until there is no more worse teams below you and the Conference comes a-knockin'.
Stability is essential, however I realise that stability can become stale and new things must be done. I don't believe for one second that changing our management will bring about the tactical haven that everyone dreams of.