Quote:
Originally Posted by shillelagh
I dont know cant make my mind up. Hows that for an answer cashy. Thats why i havent replied in this thread before.
I can see both sides - he wanted to be able to see her face and so to see her expressions etc when she replied to questions being asked her, she wanted to wear the full face veil.
Maybe an idea might have been video conferencing.. she would have been in a separate room and so then could have removed her veil, seeing as she wouldnt be in the same room as a male - female in charge of the camera.
Dont shout at me please ive just been in a labour party meeting!!!  |
as has been established there is no religious reason to wear, plus the charge was for a magistrates court which many aint got either extra room of facilities,who would pay for such a thing? the taxpayer- when theres no bloody need. therefore not a credible option to me.