[blazey]

It'd be wrong to sack someone because she wouldn't touch something. What if you work in a pet shop and your quite happy to serve on the till but when your asked to handle a rat or a snake or something you fear you refuse? Shoudl you deserve to be sacked just because you dont want to touch something? Even more so when its actually out of RESPECT for something?!

Nobody in their right mind would sack her for it because she'll be dragging them through court cases for breaching her rights and it wont be pleasant. M&S arent going to suffer economically because of this instance, so why should they bother sacking her? Anyone been put off shopping at m&s because someone refused to touch a bible? Very very unlikely