Quote:
Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris
Right, thank you for that, Eric. I reckon I'll have to go away, lie down and have a long think about it!  |
Yeh, I know that what I wrote was confused and confusing, but it is difficult for me to express complex issues in a small medium. I think that the point at the root of what I was trying to say is that at the same time we criticize those who act according to an ideology different from ours, we refuse to admit, in a sense, that we actually have an ideolgy. We don't question the way in which we organize our social structure ... we assume that it is the right and natural way. We use "ideology" as a pejoriative ... something that totalitarians have, but we really don't; a sort of "we are always right and they are usually wrong", unless they agree with us. One could argue that "democracy" and "totalitarianism" are functional rather than ontological terms: they tell us about what we do, not about the fixed being of things. I think I should stop before I confuse myself
Damn, that's good weed
