Quote:
Originally Posted by garinda
Another question.
Considering so many areas of the country are affected by the blight of drugs, isn't David Cameron's repeated refusal to answer the question as to whether he has taken illegal drugs, either at school, university, or before becoming party leader, another indicator that he is just another politican who cannot answer a straightforward question, or is his refusal to answer truthfully for a totally differing reason?
I'm not asking you to answer for Cameron, but do you think he should answer what to all extent and purposes a fairly straightforward question?
Cameron will not be excused further drug ‘revelations’ - Times Online
|
Not at all. What he has done in the past (as we all suspect) has no relevance today. People don't plan to be leader of the opposition or prime minister, they don't avoid having a 'university life' to get into politics. These are real people. As I see it I don't think people care if he smoked cannabis at university. If people really think it matters, then I guess they won't vote for him.