Quote:
Originally Posted by banjoman
I`d give mine to the groups of people that cant look out for themselves too well, ie kids, aged and disabled. I find it disgusting that you work all your life (well some people do), pay all your taxes and abide by the law, and then after a certain age get treated by certain members of society like an easy target.I always thought you respected your elders ?
Oh and as for "Though it is not funded by a charitable trust...just the hard working saps who actually go to work all their lives and pay their income tax, thus enabling those workshy parents to stay at home with their offspring." from Garinda, my wife is a stay at home mum, as the little fella is now 2 1/2. We get (I think) £17 a week child benefit only and I do go to work. We actually waited until we could "afford" a child before having one so that she could stay at home and invest the time and energy.
|
I wasn't having a go at stay at home mums, just the ludicrous suggestion that it needs both parents to stay at home until the child is four and starts school. With that suggestion if they had a child every three years they'd never have to work.
But wait, that's happening now. A whole generation are chosing a life on benefits as a full time career.
Sadly if every single person in the land decided to do that there'd be no money to pay them, because no one would be paying income tax, and which allows them to 'chose' to stay at home.
I guess my opinion is formed because I come from a background where my grandmother, widowed at twenty when her husband was killed in Normandy, was forced to find childcare for my mother while she herself worked in the mill, or they would have gone hungry. She, and millions of other hardworking Britains who made this country what it is, never had the luxury of chosing to stay at home, funded by the tax of others.