Quote:
Originally Posted by blazey
He was firing through the glass in his window, therefore in his house, and he had a license for the weapon. He'd get the blame for criminal damage to the properties no doubt, but I still don't think this man is a criminal.
Maybe if I lived life giving everything its literal meaning then yes, I might say that man is a criminal, but then I think a huge number of people would be able to define themselves on this forum as a criminal, myself definitely included, which would be ridiculous.
|
Sometime I scratch my head at some of your posts blazey, must be you ambitoin to be a defence lawyer when you finish Uni. He might have had a license for the gun but unfortunealy that does not give him the right to take pot shots at the police on the streets of the capital, as someone who was well versed in the law he knew exactly what he was doing, and would be quite aware what the outcome would be, as in bang bang your dead