[WillowTheWhisp]

Originally Posted by jambutty

You are all wandering round in circles but seem to be deliberately ignoring the fact and refusing to acknowledge it because heaven forbid you might have to agree with me, that the teacher had no right in law to angrily storm into a shop and demand that the pupils being served in it leave immediately and go to school.

We only have the shopkeepers word that the teacher angrily stormed into the shop. We have no other report from any independant witness as to what manner the teacher entered the shop. The only thing all parties agree on is the fact that the teacher did enter the shop. We cannot accept heresay as factual evidence.

Originally Posted by jambutty

WillowTheWhisp – I don’t recall that I ever said that the teacher had no right to enter the shop. But then putting words into people’s mouths is your forte so that you can make your viewpoint seem to be the right one.

See my previous comment. You keep insisting that the shopkeeper's account of the teacher's manner is accurate and factual. We do not know that, which is why I am merely pointing out that the teacher had every bit as much right to enter that shop as anyone else.