Quote:
Originally Posted by polly
No u turn as such. My first thought were that we have enough pulic jobs to employ people on and then I though of a number of people I know who are runing small business and can not make the jump to being larger businesses. They are usually held back by lack of staff. Since Nat Min Wage was introduced it has made employing someone a major leap and for the newer businesses it is a leap into the dark, so I can see that subsidised labour would be of great help. I also believe that in small businesses employees are offered a wider range of job experiences and therfor benefit more.
|
A complete U turn, no use adding as such, I now see you going from being a benevolent employer to one that wishes to take advantage of the unfortunate as well as the lazy, (the unfortunate will resent being grouped with the lazy and the lazy won't give a monkey's, they will find a way around it).
In the earlier thread you claimed to pay more because you got a better work force, created 'real' jobs and saved yourself the hassle of having to replace discontented staff.
Now you want to force people into working for struggling companies. Not all companies will be worth working for and will treat their staff accordingly.
I can also see some poor unfortunates working for bullies, being forced to work in perhaps unsafe conditions or take abuse, because if you don't do what I tell you to I will tell the dole your refusing to work and get them to stop your benefits.
