Quote:
Originally Posted by jambutty
Which part of “Strictly speaking” do you not understand?
|
I understand it very well thanks, my psychometric testing results put me in top 1% of the country for comprehension thanks.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jambutty
Any vehicle parked close to and more or less parallel with the kerb is by the fact of being parked there, likely to cause an obstruction to other road users. It may not do so at the time of parking but additional circumstances could turn it into an obstruction. A vehicle has a concession to park on the public highway providing that it is not and does not become an obstruction - not a right.
|
A vehicle doesn't sudenly become an obstruction itself, the change in circumstances would have been a result of some other influence/person and as such the obstruction would be their making not the vehicle previously parked. It does not alter teh fact that the car had teh right to park their initially.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jambutty
And I also posted my post #16. Don’t you understand English?
Talk about pernickety nit picking just to try and prove that I have got something wrong.
Don’t you ever grow up?
|
I grew up a long time ago. seemingly you like to argue rather than answer the Q that was asked.
If you got it wrong then fine, if you didn't then also fine, I asked for teh proof to something you were saying that was all
As for being pedantic, I think a term involving pots and kettles springs to mind.