Accrington Web - View Single Post

g jones · 14-08-2008, 21:19

what a load of rubbish. The Con Club was sold recently and the Church recently went up for sale. Both have owners. HM whoever have forged Government documents and the the guff about seizing ownership is way off...

The Council know NOTHING about HM or what is happening at either until today. I have arranged the real owner to have a chat with Regen as he has recently submitted a planning application for the Con Club. He did a presentation a couple of weeks back at the local Civic Society as it is Grade 2. I didn't know him before hand it has to be said. Anyway he has informed HM Gov and had a locksmith rechange the locks.

The false notice on the baptist church also had the seizure named address of the Con Club. Pranksters IMO.

The question I have is not only does NO ONE at the Council knows of or has heard anything about HM nor do we have a policy of encouraging seizure, let alone these two buildings. Baxendens
telephone conversations are bogus because planning have ben speaking with the real owners for two weeks. In fact what Baxenden said is pretty much all fraudulent and I can't find a reason for those comments to be made.

14-08-2008, 21:19	#63
g jones Senior Member+ Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,125 Liked: 14 times Rep Power: 732	Re: Accrington Conservative Club what a load of rubbish. The Con Club was sold recently and the Church recently went up for sale. Both have owners. HM whoever have forged Government documents and the the guff about seizing ownership is way off... The Council know NOTHING about HM or what is happening at either until today. I have arranged the real owner to have a chat with Regen as he has recently submitted a planning application for the Con Club. He did a presentation a couple of weeks back at the local Civic Society as it is Grade 2. I didn't know him before hand it has to be said. Anyway he has informed HM Gov and had a locksmith rechange the locks. The false notice on the baptist church also had the seizure named address of the Con Club. Pranksters IMO. The question I have is not only does NO ONE at the Council knows of or has heard anything about HM nor do we have a policy of encouraging seizure, let alone these two buildings. Baxendens telephone conversations are bogus because planning have ben speaking with the real owners for two weeks. In fact what Baxenden said is pretty much all fraudulent and I can't find a reason for those comments to be made. Last edited by g jones; 14-08-2008 at 21:24.