[accyman]

it seems to me fraud was commited but the fraudster has been protected by people refusing to speak so the police couldnt find any evidence due to been met by a wall of scilence as it was put earlier in this thread. Theres plenty of guilty criminals walking the streets because the police couldnt find enough evidence so the police not finding enough evidence dosnt make someone innocent it just makes them lucky

somthing dodgy was going on or suspicions wouldnt have been raised and the police certainly wouldnt have investigated if there was no evident reason to but there was enough suspicion to look so they did

most polotitions are crooked, the only difference is some get caught and some dont

thats my assumption from thsi thread anyway :-)