Quote:
Originally Posted by John_Timmins
one substitution changed the game and that was theirs, they chucked barry conlon on and that changed the balance of the game, they threw everything at us and our defence switched off for 10 minutes...and for anyone who thinks that coleman does not care for this club.... KIP_2795.jpg :: Accy v Bradford City
Play like that every week and we would win more games than we will lose |
Conlon came on after 60 minutes. How did that change the game, please explain. The game changed with ten minutes to go. Stanley made their substitution with ten minutes to go, what a coincidence. What I am saying is why make a substitution when everything is going right. If Coley was determined to make a substitution why not take off a striker and bring on a defender. You say you noticed that Conlon changed the game, if so, why did Coley not bring on a defender to stop the game changing or did he not notice that the game had changed since Conlon came on, if he didn't then according to you he wasn't doing his job right. Nobody says that Coley does not care for the club, but caring for a club and managing a club are two different things. All the Stanley fans care for the club but they would not make good managers. Two games in succession Coley has made substitutions that have cost us the game and anybody who says different isn't watching the same games as I am. Three times last season we lost games after leading 2-0, any other team would have put up the defence and held on to their lead, but not Coley, he wants to score three or four, we need a change of tactics to hold on to a lead. Four times this season we have scored first and finished up losing, it can't continue. I will say it again there is only one person responsible COLEY, his team, his tactics, his substitutions, his football genius. I clicked on your link to the picture of Coley, can you not read his lips? I am sure he is saying "Why did I make that substitution"