Quote:
Originally Posted by Mancie
i don't like the idea of a "data base " on anyone.. these police have been shown time after time to be incompetent... fiddling notes..stiching up people.. when will we awake to the fact that they are just not up to the job?
|
'They had not looked very hard. Some eight weeks earlier, a 31-year-old mother reported to police that she had been raped in her home in front of her children. The intruder entered the house through the rear door, armed with a Stanley knife and wearing a mask.
The woman's house backed on to Plumstead Common. Police had taken DNA from the woman, which had they bothered to interview Napper and take a blood test, they might well have matched to him.'
Rachel Nickell case: Missed clues that allowed Robert Napper to kill again | UK news | guardian.co.uk
I don't care if you, or anyone else dislikes the idea.
The fact is that if D.N.A. data base had been available, two young women, and one child, wouldn't all have been sexually violated and killed, and one innocent man wouldn't have had the finger of suspicion pointing at him for the past sixteen years.