Quote:
Originally Posted by Boeing Guy
You misunderstand me Blazey, the campaigners divided the land into 1 inch parcels. These parcels were registered by the land registry. Each parcel of land is registered in its own right. So in effect this field now has hundreds of thousands of owners.
That said having just looked at the Greenpeace site, they do mention the 4 owner situation, but are requiring people to sign up for free, to become a beneficial owner which can only help tie thing up.
|
Ah I see.
Well there are allsorts of rules about land which the airport will be able to use to its advantage. Beneficiary owners are fine and dandy but no court in the land is going to allow that land to go unused. It'll delay the runway but it wont stop it. So in a way it is a very pointless effort that will result in simply annoying a lot of people. And people who do things just to annoy others probably don't deserve freedom if they waste valuable time and effort in such stupid ways.
Imagine how much money will be wasted trying to obtain that land? It's these very people which claim they want to end poverty and starvation yet so willingly force companies to waste money trying to do things which to be quite frank will only be much more beneficial than an empty field next to an airport. It's not like it is likely to be an area of beauty if its right next to an airport.
Green peace have an interest view on immigration if I remember correctly
they'll be playing the 'we don't need more opportunities for immigrants to get into the country' card next and gaining support by putting fear into the ordinary working class man over his job.
I'm all for less pollution but I don't think it's worth a dispute which will cost a lot of money.