Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman
the original post did not say it was wrong if ya care to digest it proper, it said the way it was gone about was seedy, n IF it is andrew it was in my opinion.  |
I don't think it was seedy, whoever it was had the right under the act to enquire, maybe it would have appeared devious if this person had tried the direct approach and asked Graham while at the same time searching for the answer using the act so that they could compare the two answers?
I'm sure Graham was trying to indicate that he has nothing to hide by disclosing the answers here on site, but at the same time I think so long as the use of the information isn't for some illicit purpose then it is a perfectly acceptable way of gaining the information, otherwise what use is the freedom of information act?
Bet you didn't expect this from me did you? Whoever you are.
Accygate I bagsy being shortneck.
