How is 'Caz' even gender specific?
This thread was bang out of order in the first place for singling out a specific member and treating them like they are out of order for doing something they have every right to do.
Tell me Graham, what is the point of having such a system in place if nobody is going to use it?
You are acting like 1. a spoilt child and 2. like you have something to hide. I suggest that if you are 'innocent' then you stop acting like you have been caught doing something naughty.
I think we should be ENCOURAGING people to take an interest and using systems of checks and balance, because lets face it, there isn't enough money in this country as it is and we shouldn't be letting politicians squander money on their own privileges, especially when some of those politicians are questionable and half-rate in the first place.
It's about time people took a real interest in every single aspect of politics and criticised every little discrepancy. It does no harm to question and there are enough establishments trying to crush that out of people from the early stages of education right up to the tips of capitalism.
I'm fed up of this nonsense where Labour are secretive and elusive whilst the young Tories like Andrew are using resources and making a mockery out of the party that is meant to be for the people.
This thread has gone on long enough with absolute nonsense and people seem to be missing the basic point, and that is that Andrew and anyone else is well within their right to request information on your damn expenditures and you have no right to dissuade people from doing so.
It doesn't matter if it is a local councillor in Hyndburn or the Prime Minister himself, this is the law as it stands and what on earth makes you feel you have a right to be above it?