Quote:
Originally Posted by g jones
it would be nice if you could write a post that didn't have my name it for a start
|
Don't flatter yourself. You made this thread all about you and your wayward accusations. Don't dodge the bullet now. As you say, "Be honest and stick to the issues."
Quote:
Originally Posted by g jones
My view is not exclusively party political. All the big suggestions have come from Labour in control (a decade ago) and Labour in opposition (the last 10 years). If that is so horrendously wrong, say exactly how it is wrong.
|
Who cares which party comes up with the best ideas as long as they get done? As much as I dislike Peter Britcliffe*, he and his party must be doing something right. You claim that the only "big ideas" (whether they are good or not is unclear in your post) come from Labour. Sorry to be simplistic, but if that is true why have Labour been in opposition for a decade?
If Labour are this glowing positive force for change, why are you taking part in mudslinging here?
One of the reasons why people are so apathetic about voting these days is because of all this party politics crap. Rather than being an ideological debate forum, we have candidates who are on opposite cheeks of the same hairy ass.
By all accounts in 'the real world' you are a hard working person who does good work for his ward. What I am trying to point out, what you are not 'getting', is that the way you've portrayed yourself on here goes against your work and makes you seem sleazy, untrustworthy and only concerned with gunning down anything to do with the Conservative party. All the while maintaining that you are a 'doer' rather than a 'spouter'.
*I dislike Peter Britcliffe mainly because of his sleazy attitude towards my football team, Accrington Stanley. It may seem simplistic to you, but it is not - as you infer all my opinions to be - because I am living up to 'a fake local celebrity culture'.