[garinda]

Originally Posted by garinda

Mmmmmmmmmmm I wonder which side is winning us, the swaying voters.

There's a lot to take in.

Greed. Gross incompetence. Arrogance. Lack of intellect. Fairness. Integrity. Refusing to listen to Joe Public at 'public' meetings. Idiotic and wasteful whims, with no perceivable benefits to the borough. Megalomania. Did I mention greed, as in feathering one's own already comfortable nest?

Yes there's a lot of information for us ordinary Joes to take in.

I'd hate to say who was winning, certainly from the evidence we've had presented before us on Accy Web.

It's Hobson's choice.

For me the jury's still out.

Both sides are putting up such a mature and compelling case.

I'm sure I'm not the only voting floater who can't see who's presented a better argument in the expenses scandal...so far.