Tomorrow is a day that is being touted as a potential high risk to those of you who choose to run Windows.
to be short and concise, if you start experiencing issues tomorrow there is a good chance you are infected with a virus called Conflicker.
It would be wise to visit the AV sites today to check out what you will need to do to remove it should you find you are affected.
BBC NEWS | Technology | Q&A: Conficker protection
Quote:
Conficker, also known as Downadup or Kido, first appeared last November. The worm is self-replicating and has attacked a vulnerability in machines using Microsoft's Windows operating system, the software that runs most computers.
It can infect machines via a net connection or by hiding on USB memory drives used to ferry data from one computer to another. Once in a computer, it digs deeps, setting up defences making it hard to extract.
Among those affected by the virus have been the House of Commons and the defence forces of the UK, Germany and France.
The reason for the hype and the concern around Conficker is that 1 April is the day the worm is set to change the way it updates itself, moving to a system that is much harder to combat.
Five months ago a consortium of web security firms banded together to form the Conficker Working Group, to learn more about the worm and to try to stop it.
Last weekend the team located what they call a "fingerprint" or "signature" for the virus that means they can detect how an infected machine can be identified on a network much quicker than previously.
Security researcher Dan Kaminsky, a member of the group and director of penetration testing at IOActive, told the BBC this was a major breakthrough.
"We know these bad guys are in places they really shouldn't be. With this new trick it is much easier to find them. It means we can say, OK, I don't know what will happen but I can tell you 10,0000 systems are under the control of the bad guys and here they are."
Lucrative
While no-one in the industry is 100% sure of the aim of Conficker, they are positive the people behind it are more concerned about making money than causing mayhem.
That is a view backed by PC Magazine editor-in-chief Lance Ulanoff.
"People write malware today not because they want to make a public splash. It's old school to want to make computer screens turn red and say Love Bug.
"Today crime syndicates run these things because they are interested in making money and if they are not making money there is no point in it."
|
PS, MODs, I deliberately placed this in General Talk as it will affect most users and the less techy probably don't look in Tech Talk or the like. I think it would be wise to leave it here untill at least Thursday to ensure maximum exposure.