Quote:
Originally Posted by shakermaker
To be fair to Eric, I'm sure he doesn't mean to make silly comments like that. He hasn't got a dimplomatic bone in his body when it comes to giving statements to the press, as we have seen on many occasions. He wears his hear on his sleeve and this is the result - seemingly slagging off someone who continuously puts large sums of money into the club. Very embarrassing.
In an ideal world I, and probably a few others, would wish to see Khan as the major shareholder and Rob Heys running the club for him as a proper Chief Executive. As it is we know next to nothing of what is to happen with the ownership saga. It is known that members of the board are unhappy at Khan's decision to send his letter to the press.
I personally like the way Khan has chosen to act, it's shows us all that there is a major invester out there waiting to take the reins who has Stanley at heart.
Who can match a bid like that?
|
spot on i reckon shaker, if the board are unhappy about the letter of which i have no idea
then it says to me - they never wanted or intended to speak to Mr Khan, and if that is the case they should all follow E.W. out of the door. n not slam it on the way out.
