Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman
yeh think it through Roy, if ya removed it, ya would probably suit those ******* right down to the ground. fer my money its a good section fer folk to praise, let off steam about what they see aint right.at least the guy who i think ya got the hump wi, as the balls to come on here, don't know him but i give him credit fer that.  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willie Miller
"Folk" have used the forum for their own personal agenda, the forum ain't at fault; the fans who rush home to air their greivances towards the club on here are the ones at fault....
The club is contactable for all that crap IMHO. Anyone can chat to Eric or Rob or Mick Schultz or Coley.
Its easy for this to be used as a soap box. I have read "fans" slagging every member of the club staff on here. So why shouldn't the club remove the link? We have such a great club yet on here, you would think the world is ending.
The content of the threads on here used to be top drawer. Now Jimbo hardly posts, Lowiey the same. Unfortunately, only the negative stuff is discussed on here because , in the main, the positive posters have left the building
|
well willie miller, my post was in a response to the guy who OWNS the site,asking if the stanley section should remain, that was my answer n reason to keep it, also i forgot to add that folk who follow stanley n live abroad or a fair distance keep in touch through it so thats another reason. as fer soap boxes, you got on yours with yer bias, but never answered his question yes or no, therefore i can only assume the question was too difficult fer ya.
and as fer southern red saying nothing is suppressed by the club, i say that is bull or even untrue, most fans cannot understand why the club refuses to talk to Mr Khan
if thats not suppression i don't know what is.
