Quote:
Originally Posted by katex
I think it is the best way of getting a full picture of population movement, density, would be far more expensive to cross reference tax, registration offices, car users, employment, housing,education records and so on, to see where facilities are needed in the future. In the end, will save money.
Things don't change that quickly either ... 10 years is a fair enough period in my opinion.
|
I feel a As and when aproach would be a better solution. give facilities as and when needed not a guess from a form.
If I look back 10 years, things have change for me a lot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaysay
I think really you need to look at this with an open mind without cynicism My D, after all this head count has been going on for rather a long time and as kate said it does help the government of the day, look to forward planning in all aspects of life.
|
I am looking at it with a open mind.
Im looking at it saying, do we not have a choice, I may answer freely the questions, but there may be some I feel is none of there business.
The thing is we do not know EXACTLY what questions will be asked, as it states it can change at any time.
Also Why do they need a DOB, would age not be enough?
Help the government with forward planning, They already have a plan.
