Quote:
Originally Posted by shakermaker
"Cavanagh is understood to have paid £4,500 for a voice recognition test in an attempt to prove that his brother – not him – had placed the accumulator via telephone, which would not have broken any rules."
Why would he bother if he was guilty?
|
What about the other bets ?
Quote:
|
Cavanagh had been charged with placing a £5 accumulator that included betting on Stanley to lose at home to Bury in May 2008, as well as betting on a Reds match during the 2008/09 season and further League Two games.
|
He has been found guilty and sentenced. If his appeal is not successfull he will miss all of this season and he shouldn't be seen in a Stanley shirt again. If his appeal is successfull and he is subsequently found not guilty then I would welcome him back.